Legal Opinion

In Re Diana Shoe Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 16, 1935No. 128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

80 F.2d 92 (1935)

In re DIANA SHOE CORPORATION.

338 BERRY STREET, Inc.,

v.

CRANE et al.

No. 128.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 16, 1935.

Jonas & Neuburger, of New York City (Henry A. Spiegelman and Sidney J. Liftin, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Duberstein & Schwartz, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Max Schwartz and Samuel C. Duberstein, both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for trustee-appellee.

Abraham J. Halprin, of New York City (Irving Barry, of New York City, of counsel), for purchasers-appellees.

Kaye, Scholor, Fierman & Hays, of New York City (Mortimer D. Atlas, of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re ZimmermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Montaigne v. Rossvill Alcohol & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. 338 Berry Street, Inc. v. CraneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Consolidated Gas Electric Light &. Power Co. v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Duebler v. Sherneth Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Black v. Richfield Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
  5. Hanssen v. WingrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API