Legal Opinion

338 Berry Street, Inc. v. Crane

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 16, 1935No. 128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The debtor, Diana Shoe Corporation, filed its petition for reorganization on January 9, 1935. With unusual celerity the proceedings progressed to confirmation of a plan of reorganization on April 16, 1935. The plan provided that three creditors of the debtor, hereafter referred to as the “purchasers,” should receive a conveyance of the debtor’s assets and business and in consideration therefor should pay in full secured and priority claims and all administration expenses to be approved by the court, and should pay to general unsecured creditors “whose claims have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re ZimmermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Montaigne v. Rossvill Alcohol & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Diana Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Honorable George Templar, District Judge of the United States, District Court for the District of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API