Legal Opinion
Black v. Richfield Oil Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 25, 1941No. 230PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this action seeks relief under three separate counts. All three counts revolve around a certain licensing agreement for use of inventions entered into by the plaintiff with the Pan American Petroleum Company, under date of September 15, 1925. Under the first count, plaintiff seeks, through declaratory relief, to have the rights of the parties under said agreement determined. The second count is brought for the purpose of reforming said agreement so that it will include certain inventions of plaintiff not specifically described therein. The third count…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Modern Construction, Inc. v. Barce, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- LE Myers Co. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Treadaway v. Camellia Convalescent Hospitals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Modrey v. AMERICAN GAGE & MACHINE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.