Legal Opinion

Sierra Pacific Power Co. v. Rinehart

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1983No. 14327PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal from a judgment in a wrongful death action, appellants challenge the trial court’s decision that: (1) as landowners, appellants breached three separate duties which they owed to the decedent by not providing any safety devices during construction; and (2) as the proximate cause of their negligence, the decedent’s mother suffered damages in the sum of $800,280. We conclude that appellants did not owe the decedent a duty under any of the three theories upon which liability was based. Initially, in light of the obviousness of the danger, the trial court erred in imposing on…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Phyllis M. Nelson, Etc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Duncanson-Harrelson Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Celender v. Allegheny County Sanitary AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ray v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API