Legal Opinion
Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1987No. 16409PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
Today, we must answer the question of whether a party to a contract owes a duty of care to the employees of the other contracting party who under the contract is engaged to perform logging activities, in light of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 413 or § 416. This question is certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to I.A.R. 12.1.
The facts as contained in this certification are brief. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc., a sawmill operator, held timber rights to land in north Idaho. Regulus awarded Haynes Logging a contract to remove timber from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Phyllis M. Nelson, Etc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Duncanson-Harrelson Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- McMillan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ray v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Thompson v. JessUtah Supreme Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.