Madruga Ex Rel. Madruga v. County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LARSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ competing motions for summary judgment regarding the constitutional propriety of Riverside County Sheriff Deputy David Elden Smith’s warrantless entry into the front courtyard of the plaintiffs’ residence during the early morning hours of August 5, 2000. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
I. STANDARD FOR EVALUATING…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Amy KoenigSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Ricardo Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011