Legal Opinion

Hale v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff received wounds when he was shot by the defendant Smith, an officer on the police force of the defendant city, Coos Bay. In a damage action the plaintiff recovered a verdict against both defendants and they appeal. This all occurred before the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.260 et seq., was effective.

One 'Whitman, a mentally deranged person, climbed into the cab of plaintiff’s log truck and forced plaintiff, at gunpoint, to drive him through Coos Bay. The defendant Smith pursued the truck and plaintiff was shot in the chase.

The defendants contend that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Taylor v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dowers Farms, Inc. v. Lake CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Keesling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. State Forester v. Umpqua River Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Jackson v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API