Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wentz v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1932No. 23652Published

1ConcurrenceMcNEILL, J.

(specially concurring).

The petition of the plaintiff, Maude O. Thomas, alleges! that plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified, acting commissioner and member of the ¡State Highway Commission of the state of Oklahoma under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Oklahoma; that plaintiff is in possession of said office and exercising its duties and functions in the manner provided by law; that the defendant, Lew H. Wentz, has been and now is unlawfully claiming the right and title to the office now in possession of the plaintiff and has threatened to and will, unless enjoined by the court,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Dunham v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Hovey v. State ex rel. CarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bynum v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API