Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Kendall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1890No. 14,055PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Prom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was an action instituted in the Boone Circuit Court by the appellee against the appellants to recover damages for an alleged assault and battery. Upon a change of venue the cause was sent to the Clinton Circuit Court, where a trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the appellee for the sum of four thousand dollars.

The complaint in the cause consists of two páragraphs. The first is in the form usually employed in actions of this kind. The second paragraph is as follows:

“And for his second paragraph of complaint herein the plaintiff says that the defendants, on the 7th…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis v. . Rochester and Syracuse Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Wright v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Long v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. HechtIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kelley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. JacobsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Gash v. KohmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API