Legal Opinion
Cobble v. T-Mobile Sprint
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided May 12, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00415Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION DANIEL COBBLE, ET AL. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-000415-RGJ-RSE T-MOBILE SPRINT, AND JPMORGAN Defendants CHASE BANK, N.A. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Daniel Cobble (“Mr. Cobble”) and Rufina Cobble (“Mrs. Cobble”) (collectively, “the Cobbles”), move for default judgment against Defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc. (“Sprint”)1 and summary judgment against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) [DE 65; DE 66 (Notice of Correction of Notice of Default)]. Chase responded [DE 68], at the request of the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.