Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Marriage of Elfmont

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1995No. S038966Published

1Dissent

KENNARD, J., Dissenting.

In a unanimous decision rendered in 1985, this court held that when a married couple buys a disability insurance policy with community funds, and the disabled spouse begins receiving benefits on the policy during the marriage, policy benefits paid after the couple has separated are the disabled spouse’s separate property if such benefits were intended to replace that spouse’s postdissolution earnings, but are community property if the couple purchased the policy with the intent to provide *1044retirement income. (In re Marriage of Saslow (1985) 40 Cal.3d 848 [221 Cal.Rptr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Modern Woodmen of America v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API