Legal Opinion

Modern Woodmen of America v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1931No. Docket No. 7667PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

On February 26, 1898, plaintiff herein issued to Arthur M. Gray, a certain benefit life insurance certificate in the sum of $2,000, payable to his then wife as beneficiary. On July 17, 1918, upon proof that the prior certificate was lost or destroyed, plaintiff issued to said Arthur M. Gray a substitute certificate payable in the sum of $1,000 each to his son Ernest G. Gray and his daughter Bertha M. Gray, now Bertha M. Neil. On March 19, 1921, the insured indorsed upon said certificate a request for change of beneficiaries to Bertha M. Neil, daughter, and Nettie M.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Vieux v. VieuxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal Brotherhood v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Valentine v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Travelers Insurance v. FancherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kemp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. McBride v. McBrideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API