In Re Marriage of Jones
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
On this appeal, we hold that a married serviceman’s right to disability pay, unlike a vested right to retirement pay, does not comprise a community asset and thus does not become subject to division upon dissolution of the marriage. Such disability pay is not a form of deferred compensation for past services. Rather, it serves to compensate the veteran for the personal anguish caused by the permanent disability as well as for the loss of earnings resulting from his compelled premature military retirement and from diminished ability to compete in the civilian job market.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Guy v. GuyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Weisfeld v. WeisfeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.