Wolf v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The conviction is for unlawfully possessing a still for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquors; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two and one-half years.
Art. 1, Sec. 9 of the Constitution of Texas, reads as follows: “The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions from all unreasonable seizures or searches. No warrant to search any place or to seize any person or thing shall issue without describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.”
For the express purpose of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Brent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Childers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- State v. ZugrasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Reutlinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McTyre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Ruhmann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.