Legal Opinion
Dougherty v. Golden Gate Bridge
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 7, 1998No. C 97-2994 SBA (ARB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brought this action for injuries allegedly sustained while she was employed by defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. Plaintiff filed her complaint under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, and general admiralty law, asserting that her injuries were caused by defendant’s negligence and the unseaworthiness of defendant’s sea vessels.
Defendant now moves for summary judgment arguing that plaintiffs claims are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Michaeledes v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Wheaton v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009