Legal Opinion
Michaeledes v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 17, 2002No. C00-1723 BZPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action for injuries allegedly sustained on December 3, 1999, on the vessel M/V DEL NORTE, while he was employed by defendant Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (“District”). 1 Defendant has now moved for summary judgment on the tenth and eleventh affirmative defenses in its answer. These defenses assert that plaintiffs claim for unseaworthiness is barred by the California Tort Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 810 et seq., which prohibits claims based…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Wheaton v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009