Legal Opinion

Berry v. Chrome Crankshaft Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1958No. Civ. 23031PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiff sued Chrome Crankshaft Company and others for an injunction against the use of plaintiff’s trade secrets and secret processes, and for damages for wrongful use of same in the past. Though at issue the cause has not been tried. In conjunction with Benjamin J. Goodman, Esq., the firm of Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles patent attorneys, has appeared for defendant Chrome Crankshaft Company. During the taking of the deposition of Lile W. Harvey, one of plaintiff’s employees, plaintiff’s attorney made the claim that Mr. Lewis E. Lyon, who was examining the witness, was disqualified to represent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Smith v. Joseph G.California Court of Appeal · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API