San Francisco Savings Union v. Western Assur. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
At Law. On demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
Defendant has demurred to the complaint for want of facts to constitute a cause of action. The action is one to recover on a policy of fire insurance; the policy being pleaded in full. One of its provisions is that it is made and accepted subject to the stipulations and conditions printed on the back thereof, and among those conditions is a stipulation requiring proof of loss thereunder to be made to the company “within 60 days after the fire, unless such time is extended in writing”; and the final one provides that:
“No suit or action on this policy for the recovery…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Western Assur. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. Ex Rel. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. PospisilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Clark v. London Assurance Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Kohner v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Harris v. North British & Mercantile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.