Legal Opinion

Harris v. North British & Mercantile Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1929No. 5405PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action on a policy of fire insurance. The insured alleged a loss by fire that was covered by the policy, but his petition affirmatively disclosed that he had failed to make sworn proof of loss within 60 days after the fire. On motion of the insurer, judgment was entered dismissing- the petition; and the insured appeals.

The policy sued on was in the New York standard form. It contains several requirements with which the insured must comply, one of them being that “if fire occur the insured shall * * * within sixty days after the fire” make sworn proof of loss,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Western Assur. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1904
  4. San Francisco Savings Union v. Western Assur. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1907
  5. Bank of South Jacksonville v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Felder v. Federal Crop Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. Ex Rel. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Wilmington Amusement Co. v. Pacific Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1941
  4. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. PospisilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Bennett v. Cosmopolitan Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API