Legal Opinion
Natkin & Co. v. H.D. Fowler Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 8, 1994No. C92-0393CV; CA A78899Published
1Opinion of the Court
876 P.2d 319 (1994)
128 Or. App. 311
NATKIN & COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, Appellant,
v.
H.D. FOWLER COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and Couch Pump Company, a division of M & W Pump Corporation, a Florida corporation, Respondents.
C92-0393CV; CA A78899.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted December 15, 1993.
Decided June 8, 1994.
Jeffrey K. Hanson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Joseph A. Yazbeck, Jr., and Bennett, Yazbeck & O'Halloran, P.C.
Frederick C. Ruby, Tigard, argued the cause for respondent H.D. Fowler Co. With him on the brief were…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Hansen v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- City of Ashland v. HoffarthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.