Legal Opinion
Dalton v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 1933No. Docket No. 8768PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This is an action for the posses sion of a certain tract of land consisting of five acres to which plaintiffs claim to be entitled for a mill site for the reduction of quicksilver ore from a near-by cinnabar mine owned by them.
The amended complaint contains two counts, in the first of which it is alleged that plaintiffs are the owners of said five-acre tract and entitled to the possession thereof, and that defendants claim and assert some interest therein but that said claim is without right. They allege in the second count that they are the owners in fee of said five…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Independence Placer Mining Co. v. HellmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hess v. MoodeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.