Legal Opinion
Savage v. Howell
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1940No. 4554PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MABRY, Justice.
This suit is upon a supersedeas bond. The bond was given on appeal to this court upon a declaratory judgment entered against one S. J. Howell and in favor of Bond & Brother Mercantile Company, which case was heretofore appealed to this court and affirmed. Howell v. G. W. Bond & Bros. Mercantile Co., 43 N.M. 97, 85 P.2d 749. The questions here presented are whether the judgment referred to and so appealed from and affirmed is a money judgment, and whether, under the pleadings and the bond sued upon, any damages are shown.
■On February 14, 1938, a judgment was entered in a cause…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Brindley v. MearaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Burguete v. G. W. Bond & Bro. Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Corker v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Village of Bay v. GelvickOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. HouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- American Linen Supply of New Mexico, Inc. v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.