Legal Opinion
Earley v. Landsidle
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided February 26, 1999No. Record 981552PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus brought by the Attorney General of Virginia, Mark L. Earley, under the provisions of Code § 8.01-653. The issue before us is whether to grant a motion to dismiss the Attorney General’s motion to join as parties Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk, Virginia House of Delegates, and Susan Clarke Schaar, Clerk, Senate of Virginia (the Clerks). The Clerks assert in their motion to dismiss, among other things, that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider the Attorney General’s petition.
The Comptroller of Virginia, William E. Landsidle,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Morrison v. BestlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Thacker v. Hubard & Appleby, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Ragan v. Woodcroft Village ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Abbott v. WilleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Alliance v. Com., Dept. of Environ. QualitySupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Cummings v. FulghumSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Woods v. MendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Board of Supervisors v. BOARD OF ZONINGSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Vaughn, Inc. v. BeckSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.