Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Fulghum

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 2001No. Record 000115PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether a plea of recoupment under Code § 8.01-422 is subject to a statute of limitations defense raised by a plaintiff in an action to enforce payment of a note.

The following facts are undisputed. On December 3, 1997, Jean S. Fulghum filed a motion for judgment against Brenda P. Cummings to enforce payment of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust. Cummings and her late husband, Kenneth V. Cummings, Jr., had executed the note pursuant to a March 1987 contract between the Cummingses and a construction contractor, Larry W. Primm (Primm), and his corporation,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Earley v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Ragan v. Woodcroft Village ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. Greenberg v. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Neely v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Abbott v. WilleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Boynton v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Woods v. MendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Vaughn, Inc. v. BeckSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Cook v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API