Legal Opinion

Cauble v. Worsham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1902No. 1148PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, .in an appeal from Hill County. Worsham and others sued Cauble and others and recovered judgment. Defendants appealed, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

in error brought this suit to recover of plaintiff in error 153 acres of land in two tracts, one of 100 acres and the other of 53 acres; and in the District Court judgment was rendered for plaintiff, Mrs. Worsham, for an undivided half of the 100 acres, and for defendant, Cauble, for the 53 acres. The appeal of Cauble to the Court of Civil Appeals involved only the title to the 100 acres, and the judgment of that court, affirming that of the District Court, is brought in review by this writ of error. The titles of both parties proceed from D. B. Cauble, who, prior…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sprague v. HainesTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Murphy v. StellTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. McLaren v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Steed v. PettyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wells v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Davis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Alworth v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Dawson v. TumlinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API