Barrington Joseph Johnson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing En Banc *
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, and ROBB, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. PER CURIAM:
This appeal comes to us following Appellant’s District Court jury trial conviction for rape. 22 D.C.Code § 2801. Appellant stresses the factually-oriented issue of consent and alleges the Government’s failure to establish a prima facie case of lack of consent by the complaining witness.
I
At trial the emphasis was on the conflicting testimony offered by the Complainant and Defendant on the issues of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Jefferson Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Herbert F. McGill Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack R. Duckworth, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Timothy Duane Arcoren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry BrulayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.