United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry Brulay
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges. *982HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The law of entrapment in this circuit is confused and conflicting. Our cases can be reconciled neither with each other nor with Sorrells v. United States (1932) 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413; Sherman v. United States (1958) 356 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 819, 2 L.Ed.2d 848; and United States v. Russell (1973) 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366.
We now set the circuit’s entrapment law in order by holding that a defendant may…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- United States v. Odell BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Pohlot, StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.