Legal Opinion

Nash v. Herbster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

932 A.2d 183 (2007)

Kelly Lee NASH, Appellee

v.

Matthew Thomas HERBSTER, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted June 11, 2007.

Filed August 24, 2007.

Matthew T. Herbster, appellant, pro se.

Kelly L. Nash, appellee, pro se.

BEFORE: HUDOCK, ORIE MELVIN and JOHNSON, JJ.

OPINION BY HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 Matthew Thomas Herbster (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the order of the trial court denying his petition to modify the amount of his child support obligation without a hearing. We vacate and remand with instructions.

¶ 2 The pertinent facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows.[1] By…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Leasure v. LeasureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Yerkes v. YerkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Larson v. DivegliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. McClain v. McClainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API