Legal Opinion

Yerkes v. Yerkes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2003No. 151 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

The question presented in this case is whether incarceration, standing alone, is a “material and substantial change in circumstances” that provides sufficient grounds for modification or termination of a child support order. We hold that it is not.

*296Appellant Keith A. Yerkes (“Father”) and Appellee Lydia A. Yerkes (“Mother”) were married in November 1978 and separated in August 1992. During their marriage, the parties had two children: Amy, born in January 1988, and Richard, born in August 1988. Immediately following the parties’ separation, Mother sought child…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Costello v. LeNoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Knights v. KnightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Marriage of Lambert v. LambertIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kimock v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Adkins v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ewing v. EwingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Plunkard v. McConnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API