Yerkes v. Yerkes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice NIGRO.
The question presented in this case is whether incarceration, standing alone, is a “material and substantial change in circumstances” that provides sufficient grounds for modification or termination of a child support order. We hold that it is not.
*296Appellant Keith A. Yerkes (“Father”) and Appellee Lydia A. Yerkes (“Mother”) were married in November 1978 and separated in August 1992. During their marriage, the parties had two children: Amy, born in January 1988, and Richard, born in August 1988. Immediately following the parties’ separation, Mother sought child…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Costello v. LeNoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Knights v. KnightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marriage of Lambert v. LambertIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Kimock v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Adkins v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Ewing v. EwingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Plunkard v. McConnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.