Loewe v. Union Savings Bank
District Court, D. Connecticut
At Law. Actions in the nature, of scire facias by D. E. Loewe and others against the Union Savings Bank, against the Norwalk Savings Society, against the South Norwalk Savings Bank, and against the Savings Bank of Danbury. On motions to open defaults in each action.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
These are all motions to open defaults obtained by the plaintiff for failure to answer a demurrer within the time fixed by the District Court rule, which requires all such pleadings to be filed within 30 days from the return day, unless such time is extended by order of court.
The actions are of the nature of scire facias under section 943 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, Revision of 1902, in consummation of actions begun by process of foreign attachment.
[1] The’defaults were entered by the clerk, as of course, on February 16, 1915, during the December term, 1914,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Weed v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Klever v. SeawallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Lennon v. RawitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. PerlsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- United States v. TodarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- In re Thames Towboat Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- Canning v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
- Loewe v. Union Savings Bank of DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.