Legal Opinion
Loewe v. Union Savings Bank of Danbury
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 12, 1915No. Nos. 1801, 1807PublishedCited by 1 opinion
At Law. Actions by D. E. Loewe and others against the Union Savings Bank of Danbury and against the Savings Bank of Danbury. Defendants move for hearings in damages, and that the United Hatters of North .America be given notice of the pendency of the actions.
1Opinion of the Court
THOATA,S, District Judge.
These are actions of scire facias, brought under section 931 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, Revision of 1902, in consummation of garnishments made in the original actions in which the plaintiffs, prior to the beginning of these actions, recovered judgments against the defendants, respectively.
[1] Section 931 of the General Statutes of Connecticut provides:
“¡Such garnishee shall be liable to satisfy such judgment out of liis own estate, as his own propel' debt, if the effects, or debt, be of suflicient value or amount; if not, then to the value of such…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shepard v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Gardner v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Coit v. SistareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Lamaster v. KeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lamphear v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loewe v. Union Savings Bank of DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1916