Legal Opinion

United States v. Todar

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1930No. Nos. 4145, 4146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the provisions of title 28 U. S. Code, § 41(20), 28 USCA § 41(20), each of appellees brought suit against the United States for alleged breach of contract to transmit, for each of them, a sum of money to Bucharest, Roumania. The contracts were made July 2, 1919, while the United States was operating the Western Union Company. By stipulation the eases were tried together by the court in October, 1927, and judgment against appellant was given in each.

In the appellate proceedings to reverse these judgments we meet at the outset two vigorously pressed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Loewe v. Union Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
  3. Mcglashan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  4. United States v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Hammond Hotel & Improvement Co. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Compania De Navegacion Transmar, S. A. v. Georgia Hardwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Rieke Metal Products Co. v. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  5. Joerns v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API