Legal Opinion
State v. Vanderpool
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2013No. S-12-755PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. VANDERPOOL 111 Cite as
286 Neb. 111
admission is not finally approved as above provided, it may not be used as evidence against the Respondent in any way. Pursuant to § 3-313, and given the conditional admission, we find that respondent knowingly does not challenge or contest the matters conditionally admitted. We further deter- mine that by his conduct, respondent violated conduct rules §§ 3-507.1 and 3-508.4(a), as well as his oath of office as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nebraska. Respondent has waived all additional proceedings…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Mitchell, Dennis L.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. ChairezNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SpangNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. PrivettNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AlfredsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LodingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.