South Carolina Coin Operators Ass'n v. Beasley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The General Assembly sent the 1995-96 Appropriations *185Act1 to Governor Beasley on June 13, 1995, and adjourned sine die. The Governor returned the Appropriations Act with his veto message to the Speaker and members of the House on June 29, 1995. At issue here is the validity of veto message number 97 which strikes parts of section 67 of the Act relating to the regulation and licensing of video slot machines. We granted petitioners’ request for original jurisdiction.
Petitioners challenge the validity of veto 97 on the following two grounds: first, the Governor exceeded his veto authority by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Arnett, Sec'y of State v. Meredith, Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Jones v. RockefellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cox v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Parker v. Bates, TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drummond v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Jackson v. SanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Gatewood v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.