Legal Opinion

White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. Applegate

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1929No. 101PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

This case involves a question as to the constitutional validity of the back tax law of Arkansas. Section 1 of Act No. 169 of the Arkansas Acts of 1913 — which is set forth in the margin1 — provides that where, because of any inadequate or insufficient valuation or assessment, or undervaluation, of any property which belonged to any corporation at the time .taxes thereon should have been properly assessed and paid, there are overdue and unpaid taxes thereon owing to the State or a political subdivision thereof by any corporation, the Attorney General shall institute a suit in chancery in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Fort Smith Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. ArbuckleSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. New York State v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Llinois Central Railroad v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. New York Steam Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API