Legal Opinion

McElmeel v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 8, 2006No. 1-04-1857 RelPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE CAHILL

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs Eric McElmeel and his mother, Elisa McElmeel, individually and as the administrator of the estate of her other son, Anthony McElmeel, appeal from a trial court order of summary judgment for defendant Safeco Insurance Company. The trial court determined that plaintiffs could not “stack,” or aggregate, automobile insurance coverage to obtain a higher level of coverage for an accident with an uninsured driver. Because we believe the facts of this case are controlled by the supreme court ruling in Hobbs v. Hartford Insurance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Menke v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bruder v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pekin Ins. Co. v. Estate of GobenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Grzeszczak v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Agribusiness Insura v. Toni DuganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Abram v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Abram v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Sherrod v. Esurance Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API