Legal Opinion
Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Cambridge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 2005No. A03-845Published
1Opinion of the Court
693 N.W.2d 426 (2005)
Sandy TISCHER, Appellant,
v.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CAMBRIDGE, Respondent.
No. A03-845.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
March 24, 2005.
Mary Dawn Tietjen, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis MN, for Appellant.
Thomas P. Malone, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd., Coon Rapids MN, and Edward Peter Sheu, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd., Minneapolis MN, for Respondent.
Susan L. Naughton, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, MN, Amicus for League of Minnesota Cities.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant Sandy Tischer sued…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.