Legal Opinion

Cook v. Thomson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1964No. Civ. 21753PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Respondent Cook’s complaint against appellant contained two counts, the first upon an express oral contract to pay respondent $10,000 for certain services, and the second upon a common count for services rendered. The trial court found that appellant had entered into an oral agreement whereby appellant agreed to pay respondent for his services “a finder’s fee, and this court finds a reasonable fee determined by said court and said parties to be in the sum of $2,000.00 as and for said compensation and finder’s fee. ...” Additionally the court found that “pursuant to said oral agreement”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Aguirre v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Anderson v. PastoriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Ziv Television Programs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Gregg M. Lumetta, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Robotics, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Cook v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Shore v. Commercial Bankers Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API