Shore v. Commercial Bankers Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P.J.
Plaintiff Michael Shore appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant Commercial Bankers Life Insurance Company (“Commercial”). The appeal has merit and the judgment must be reversed.
Facts
This is a most refreshing case in that, on sharply conflicting evidence, the trial court found all the relevant facts in plaintiff’s favor, but held against him solely on a point of law. We shall therefore only relate that aspect of the evidence which supports the findings of fact.
In 1965 plaintiff had discussions with officers of Commercial concerning the possibility that Coastal Union,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Murdock v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Cook v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964