Legal Opinion
Wolford v. Tankersley
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1985No. 13764Published
1Opinion of the Court
695 P.2d 1201 (1984)
107 Idaho 1062
J.T. WOLFORD, dba Wolford Realty and C.B. Empey and Ilene B. Empey, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Cross-Appellants,
v.
Lloyd T. TANKERSLEY and Dora Gennette Tankersley, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Respondents.
No. 13764.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
May 22, 1984.
On Rehearing February 5, 1985.
Harold L. Ryan and Michael B. Sweet, Weiser, for defendants-appellants, cross-respondents.
Dale Smith, Fruitland, for plaintiffs-respondents, cross-appellants.
DONALDSON, Chief Justice.
In 1974, the plaintiffs-respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Empey, decided to…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.