Legal Opinion
State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1969No. 347PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendants were indicted and convicted upon jury trial of burglary as defined in § 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, 1964). They appeal and rely upon three points for reversal. Defendant, Fred Sedillo, also relies upon a fourth point. These points will be considered in the order of their presentation in the brief in chief.
The first point is that the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion to suppress as evidence (1) a flashlight and pair of gloves taken from under the front seat of an automobile which was being driven by and apparently belonged to defendant,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. AguirreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.