Legal Opinion
State v. Harrison
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1970No. 375PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
There were armed robberies of a service station and a drive-in theater. Woods, Harrison and Davidson were convicted of both offenses. Their appeals require discussion of: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence, including evidence as an aider and abettor; (2) whether there should have been separate trials; (3) whether lineup identification should have been suppressed; (4) search and seizure; and (5) the failure to give a limiting instruction.
Sufficiency of the evidence.
Each of the defendants challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.(a) Woods.
This defendant asserts the proof…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. FordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.