Legal Opinion
People v. Carrero
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*534During jury deliberations the jury requested that both the testimony of a detective and the defendant’s testimony be reread. The detective’s testimony was read and the trial court then recessed for approximately 20 minutes to conduct court business and to allow the stenographer a rest. As the jury retired to the jury room, the court told the jury to let it know if it wanted to hear the other testimony. During the recess, the jury sent a note indicating they had reached a verdict. The court thereafter polled each juror to ascertain if he or she wished to hear the defendant’s testimony and each…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ElieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. McCrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. GadsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BarbellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.