Legal Opinion

State v. Saltz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2007No. 24617-5-IIIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Gardner Saltz received an exceptional sentence for second degree malicious mischief. On appeal, he claims that one of the court’s aggravating factors — that prior unscored misdemeanors resulted in a presumptive sentence that was clearly too lenient — violated Blakely1 and Hughes2 principles. And he asserts that the exceptional sentence cannot be upheld on the remaining aggravating factor — rapid recidivism.

Schultheis, A.C.J. —

¶2 We conclude that although the “too lenient” determination is one for the jury, the sentence can be upheld on the substantial and compelling factor of rapid…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. ZiganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API