Legal Opinion

Maltby v. Shook

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1955No. Civ. 20602PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Solomon and Jasper and from the order denying his motion to set aside the judgment.

In his first amended complaint, which purports to state three causes of action, plaintiff Maltby alleged that he is the assignee of the rights of the Monterey Café, a partnership, and the lawful owner and holder of the “within claim.” The first count alleges that Charles J. Shook, one of the defendants, was an employee of defendant Royal Machine Works, and at all times referred to acted within the course and scope of his employment. Upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Kimber v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Oil Well Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Blue Haven PoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Murphy v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Willard v. HagemeisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Segura v. BrundageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API