Legal Opinion
Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 25, 1997No. 95-1184PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
A number of growers, handlers, and processors of California tree fruits (respondents) brought this proceeding to challenge the validity of various regulations contained in marketing orders promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture. The orders impose assessments on respondents that cover the expenses of administering the orders, including the cost of generic advertising of California nectarines, plums, and peaches. The question presented to us is whether the requirement that respondents finance such generic advertising *461is a law “abridging the freedom of speech” within the meaning of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Janus v. State, County, and Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. United Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.