Legal Opinion

Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Assn.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 2005No. 03-1164PublishedCited by 250 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

For the third time in eight years, we consider whether a federal program that finances generic advertising to promote an agricultural product violates the First Amendment. In these cases, unlike the previous two, the dispositive question is whether the generic advertising at issue is the Government’s own speech and therefore is exempt from First Amendment scrutiny.

I

A

The Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985 (Beef Act or Act), 99 Stat. 1597, announces a federal policy of promoting the marketing and consumption of “beef and beef products,” using funds raised by an assessment on cattle sales…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by250 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Pleasant Grove City v. SummumSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Morgan v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API