Legal Opinion
Saar v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1989No. 86 Civ. 9680 (JES)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Pro Se prisoner Zvi Saar 1 brings this Bivens 2 action pursuant to the First, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. 3 Plaintiff alleges that defendants deprived him of access to his personal property and legal materials inhibiting his access to the courts, segregated him in administrative detention in violation of his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment, and failed to provide him with adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against the use of cruel and unusual punishment. As relief for these alleged…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kuck v. DanaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Conklin v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Duff v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Morris v. EversleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.