Legal Opinion
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 4, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-135; Consol. Court No. 15-00213PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Claire R. Kelly, Judge,
Kelly, Judge: Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of - Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) remand determination in the antidumping duty (“ADD”) investigation of certain steel nails from Taiwan, filed pursuant to the court’s order in Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States, 41 CIT-, 219 F.Supp.3d 1326 (2017). See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, June 21, 2017, ECF No. 95 (“Remand Results”); see also Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States, 41 CIT -, -, 219. F.Supp.3d 1326, 1351 (2017) (“Mid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nexteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.