Legal Opinion
NEXTEEL Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 2, 2019No. Slip Op. 19-1; Consol. Court No. 17-00091PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Choe-Groves, Judge:
This is a case of first impression, involving the first time that the U.S. Department of Commerce ("Department" or "Commerce") found the existence of a particular market situation in an administrative review under The Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015 ("TPEA"). Plaintiff NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. ("NEXTEEL"), Consolidated Plaintiffs Husteel Co., Ltd. ("Husteel"), Hyundai Steel Company ("Hyundai"), SeAH Steel Corporation ("SeAH"), AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. ("AJU Besteel"), and Maverick Tube Corporation ("Maverick") (collectively, "Consolidated Plaintiffs"), and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nexteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Dong-A Steel Co. v. United StatesPublic version posted 10/01/2020.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Nexteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.